Connect with us

NFT

The Future of NFT Gaming Doesn’t Rely on Big Capital Expenditures

Large game publishers typically oppose your ability to trade freely. The economic model used in popular games, where players purchase in-game cash or points in order to unlock more content and improve their experience, is at existential risk from NFTs (non-fungible tokens).

Published

on

If it were possible to regulate the flow of NFTs in a closed market, this would be a different story. Interoperability will be key in the future, according to industry upstarts, and digital assets represented by NFTs will be portable from one platform to another.

Large gaming companies generate billions of dollars from microtransactions, and a key factor in their success is their ability to retain players willing to pay money for in-game items. These businesses have developed systems that entirely exclude any legitimate third-party access to certain material or digital assets because they want their player base to invest a lot of money in the game.

NFTs have the potential to be revolutionary since they open the door for broad lending of these assets in addition to allowing speculators to profit. It’s no longer necessary for a player to put a significant number of money into the game in order to fully enjoy it by enabling investors to purchase an NFT and then loan it out to someone – either for a fee or a profit-split arrangement.

How play-to-earn is implemented

A fully developed gaming ecosystem will see the emergence of two different types of stakeholders. Investors who have a sizable portfolio of in-game NFTs are less likely to play the game in exchange for a daily return of $50. Then there are gamers from all over the world, who in certain circumstances would make significantly more money than the minimum wage under a profit-sharing system for lending.

The second category, who can have less money, is more worried about the short-term volatility and low liquidity of digital assets. They are unable to take the risk of accumulating NFTs in the hopes that they will be steadily profitable and hold or increase in value.

In the gaming industry, tradeable digital assets already exist. However, the practice of putting these assets on the blockchain is expanding; this was a general trend in 2021, when NFTs earned $8.4 billion in revenue. The logical next step for this sector is video games, and since more and more of these sales are shifting to blockchain gaming, there may soon be a noticeable increase in established companies moving in-game objects, characters, and skins on-chain.

As opposed to nominally belonging to the investor or player but really being at the mercy of a centralized gaming platform that can ban the user at any time, on-chain assets are designated as unique and belonging to one true owner. It’s more decentralized and provides users a lot more room to choose their own routes, especially when it comes to lending in-game items and lowering entrance barriers.

creating the framework for play-to-earn players to borrow If NFTs result in a rapid expansion of the player base in new markets, they can be extremely advantageous for game producers. Even before one considers how digital assets might be coded to meet cross-platform use cases or be employed in metaverses, making the industry more accessible irrevocably alters the entire landscape.

The compatibility of digital resources

The idea of full cross-metaverse employment of NFTs on a single digital identity raises a host of hitherto unimagined benefits. As a result, potential value is unlocked and speculation may be brought under control in a less erratic and more stable market.

The restrictions must be adjusted and will be based on the rarity of particular assets and what you may do with them. Can they be upgraded? Can you construct on NFT land to increase its value? Should players be able to own an entire mountain, or can they only purchase plots? It will be entirely community-driven if gamers own everything, but creators should have some voice and may feel the need to impose restrictions.

It is likely that a DAO (decentralized autonomous organization) operated system, in which the entire globe is owned by members and NFT holders, is now being developed. However, it is unclear whether this will be sustainable without a rigid set of regulations.

establishing NFT financing

When you attempt to transfer an actual NFT to another user’s digital wallet, problems happen. You would want the loanee to post collateral to secure the loan because there is a danger of the loanee defaulting. This creates a capital cost that acts as a barrier to entry for a sizable number of potential players.

A preferable approach would be one in which the NFT’s utility, or “wrapped,” is the sole thing rented out. An NFT holder can put the asset in a smart contract, specify the loan terms, post it for rent on the market, and let the free market function as it should.

The wrapped NFT is a newly created copy that has the same metadata, URLs, and other characteristics as the original and can be programmed to expire after a specific date. By doing so, the human-trust layer is removed, and the remarkable security that blockchains offer is provided. In essence, this wrapped NFT is only useful and cannot be spent.

It expires, returns to the smart contract at the maturity date, and is burnt as the result of a frictionless, risk-free, and collateral-free NFT lending system. Additionally, if the loanee improves a piece of land or gives a character a lot more playtime, the original NFT might appreciate as a result of the loan.

The blockchain will be updated with these changes as a direct result of the wrapped NFT’s experience. Most NFT projects and protocols are moving in the direction of this methodology in the wake of the infamous Axie Infinity hack, which cost $600 million.

The rumor about large developers

Popular game producers will find it more difficult to avoid presenting some sort of product if current trends continue and the NFT lending sector experiences significant expansion over the following few years.

Ubisoft and Epic Games are already testing, and it’s feasible that NFTs may follow the same trajectory as the idea of cryptocurrencies in general, where everyone will eventually use elements of distributed ledger technology. The notion is that this will become too alluring for businesses to ignore, or they may employ private chains or something similar.

The play-to-earn buzz is not something that traditional gamers like, and they frequently have a point. The overall quality of the market is now relatively low, and players just play these games to earn cryptocurrency, so there isn’t much to get excited about. This has a detrimental effect because it was once hailed as the new paradigm.

The problem of people quitting a project because the value of the rewards has declined due to a token price fall is still there.

Some time may pass before those seeking a better future in NFT gaming. The profitability of large developers’ existing strategies won’t be simply abandoned in favor of a more decentralized NFT-based economy because doing so would undermine their economic model. However, seasoned creators may begin experimenting with already-existing in-game assets as NFTs, and they may profit greatly in this fashion.

Unless their bottom line is in danger or a highly lucrative opportunity arises, multibillion-dollar corporations often adapt slowly. Maybe both of these elements will be crucial in bringing about a change in how we handle digital assets.

NFT

Launching with a partnership with Crypto.com, the Cronos-based NFT platform Minted

Minted, a non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace promoted by Cronos Labs, debuted on Thursday and announced a partnership with market leader Crypto.com.

Published

on

Even though there are other NFT marketplaces on Cronos, Minted enables top-tier NFT projects like Moonbirds, Otherdeeds, and other well-known NFTs frequently based on Ethereum to be featured alongside Cronos-based ones. The platform will support over 10 million NFTs from 2,800 projects.

Following their collaboration, Minted will handle any secondary trades of Cronos-based NFTs initially sold on Crypto.com.

Users can list their NFTs built on Ethereum on the marketplace in exchange for $MTD, the platform’s native coin. Then, $MTD can be staked to earn yield for a predetermined period. The user receives more benefits while using well-known NFTs, such as Moonbirds and Otherdeeds, or uncommon NFTs.

Looksrare and other NFT marketplaces have previously provided users with prizes for listing NFTs. The Block earlier claimed that Looksrare saw significant wash-trading before losing popularity.

According to a project manager at Minted who went by the pseudonym Marco and spoke to The Block, the site has parameters to prevent users from abusing rewards. One such strategy is incentivizing users to price their NFTs fairly instead of doing so at an inflated or depressed cost. According to Marco, they receive one more point if they list the NFT for two times the floor price. The points increase to two if they advertise it at 1.1 times the floor price, though.

Overall, Minted wants to be multi-chain from the beginning with Ethereum and Cronos and give users a more intentional experience, Cronos managing director Ken Timsit told The Block.

“The concept is simply to construct a collection of features more thoughtfully for creators, companies, and users that deliver an NFT experience that is more curated and careful.”

Continue Reading

NFT

HitPiece, a music NFT platform, prioritizes ownership rights following a difficult test debut

The music non-fungible token (NFT) platform HitPiece, which caused controversy when it first went live in beta back in February, is fully operational. Additionally, the revised version will try to steer clear of the copyright problems that the beta version encountered, according to co-founder Rory Felton.

Published

on

The beta debut of HitPiece sparked controversy among musicians who alleged that their works were posted on the platform without their knowledge or consent. HitPiece ultimately made the decision to delete its beta website.

Felton told The Block that the company improved the platform based on community feedback in an effort to make it the go-to location for music NFTs.

highlighting property rights
Felton asserted that there was absolutely no music available on the HitPiece beta platform and that the business would never offer music for sale without the necessary commercial rights. According to him, it was designed to be a private experience that was created on a private blockchain. Nothing was decentralized or marketable through a third party.

However, when artists discovered their work on HitPiece, they asserted that it had been minted as NFTs against their will. The Recording Industry Association of America even demanded HitPiece stop selling NFTs in a letter of demand.

Clearly, we realized we made some mistakes after receiving the criticism in early February. Fletcher stated. “We didn’t put the required safeguards in place to make sure that only creators and owners of the rights to use their intellectual property could mint NFTs containing their creative assets. Therefore, we removed that beta and created a product that, in our opinion, makes sense for both the market and artists.

Five months later, HitPiece is prioritizing ownership rights and advancing the interests of the platform’s artists as it goes public.

Felton claimed that the company’s Wednesday announcement of a partnership with Audible Magic shows that emphasis. We collaborated with [Audible Magic] because we believe it’s crucial that only the song’s owners and rights holders mint NFTs with that music on them.

By 2021, there will be over 100 million songs available on Audible Magic from over 400,000 record labels. To make sure that no copyright laws will be breached by minting an NFT, artists and rights holders must register on HitPiece, validate their identity, and have their uploaded content reviewed against Audible Magic’s database.

Additionally, HitPiece will pay the transaction fees and minting expenses incurred by platform-using artists. However, according to Felton, the platform might never cover the cost of gas and other costs.

Felton, a lifelong music enthusiast, and Jeff Birmingham, a Spotify early investor, co-founded HitPiece in 2020. According to Felton, “it became obvious to me that there were chances for music artists who take advantage of the space to produce new revenue streams and engage with their audience in novel ways.”

According to musician ATL Jacob, who spoke at the platform’s debut, “Web3 has great potential to be a catalyst for increasing artistic integrity, autonomy, and engagement for any musician, regardless of their reach.” ATL Jacob is one of the “dozens” of musicians already utilizing the platform, according to HitPiece, and he currently holds the top spot on Billboard’s Hot 100 Producers chart.

Every musician should eventually sign up for web3, according to Felton. “I think some will move into this area faster than others, but I think it’s here and I think that’s kind of like an ostrich burying its head to ignore it,” the speaker said.

Continue Reading

NFT

Avalanche Increases by Nearly 15% Amid Rising NFT Volumes

Avalanche, a well-known Ethereum rival, has increased by double digits as the network’s NFTs gain popularity.

Published

on

Among the top 20 largest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, Avalanche (AVAX) is leading the increases.

The trade volume for AVAX, the coin that powers the layer-1 blockchain, increased by 23 percent during the last day and is up 14.18 percent.

According to information from CoinMarketCap, the coin is presently trading at about $29.3. The cryptocurrency is still down 80.55 percent from its all-time high of $146.22 in November 2021, despite a 25 percent increase during the previous seven days.

Data from DefiLlama shows that the total value locked (TVL), a measure of on-chain DeFi activity, has increased 1.74 percent during the previous 24 hours. Avalanche currently has a TVL of $2.42 billion.

The bullish movement of today destroyed short traders. Data from Coinglass shows that over the last day, short positions on AVAX totaled $1.98 million. Over the same time period, long deals totalling $363.8K were also liquidated.

NFT Demand on Avalanche is Growing
The rapid expansion of Avalanche-based NFTs looks to be one of the primary drivers of today’s bullish price movement.

Data from CryptoSlam shows that trading volumes have surged by 30.90% during the last 24 hours. Over the same time period, the overall number of sales grew by 12 percent, going from 125 to 140.

According to data from CryptoSlam, the most popular Avalanche NFT collection Navy Seal Game trade volume increased by 62.7 percent in the last day. The trade volume of other NFT collections, such as Avapepes and Pizza Game Chefs, has also increased significantly during the same time frame.

Along with Avalanche, the two most popular cryptocurrencies over the previous day have seen gains: Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH).

Bitcoin has increased by 5% over the last day and is currently trading at about $24,129, according to statistics from CoinMarketCap.

According to data from CoinMarketCap, the price of ETH has increased by 5.3 percent during the last 24 hours to be about $1,772.

Continue Reading

Trending

bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 24,529.57 0.08%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 1,982.48 0.10%
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00 0.04%
chiliz
Chiliz (CHZ) $ 0.181175 12.79%
enjincoin
Enjin Coin (ENJ) $ 0.720569 1.65%
decentraland
Decentraland (MANA) $ 1.08 0.67%
flow
Flow (FLOW) $ 2.88 2.51%
the-sandbox
The Sandbox (SAND) $ 1.36 1.31%
wax
WAX (WAXP) $ 0.126595 1.02%
ecomi
ECOMI (OMI) $ 0.001680 0.62%