Connect with us


Nifty Gateway Cutting Ethereum Gas Fees by 70%

The NFT marketplace, which has lately expanded, will unveil a hybrid, semi-custodial approach that it claims will significantly reduce Ethereum gas expenses on its exchange.



#nft #niftygateway #ethereum #gasfees #nfthours

Nifty Gateway, an NFT marketplace focused primarily on selected art drops, has lately shifted its purpose to become an aggregator of Ethereum NFT marketplaces. However, as co-founders Duncan and Griffin Cock Foster point out, that was only the first stage in the broader plan. Today, the business unveiled a novel approach for reducing Ethereum gas prices on NFT transactions by up to 70%.

Gas is the variable cost of transacting on the Ethereum blockchain, which currently hosts most NFT trading activity. These costs have risen to new highs as the NFT business bursts in demand in 2021. To many, the gas fees have made Ethereum NFT sales too expensive for all except the most giant ETH whales who gamble on flipping their NFT investments in the future to recoup their expenses (and then some).

Even long-time fans are rethinking the feasibility of the current dominant NFT ecosystem as the argument about Ethereum gas fees has reached a fever pitch recently, resulting in Twitter spats.

“At the present time, gas fees have become a really difficult issue for all Ethereum-based projects,” Duncan said. “A lot of times, if you’re spending $200 on an NFT and the gas price to purchase that NFT is $100, you’ll just choose not to get it.”

Nifty Gateway proposes a novel approach to problem-solving. Beginning in January, the marketplace will use its current custodial system to conduct wallet-to-wallet trades that will use substantially less gas than a comparable peer-to-peer trade elsewhere, according to the company.

In effect, it’s a hybrid model. Nifty’s solution takes some of the on-chain processes required for a wallet-to-wallet transaction on rival marketplace OpenSea and manages them outside of the Ethereum blockchain to reduce the total gas cost hit.

According to the twin co-founders, the total gas savings with this strategy might be as high as 70% compared to OpenSea. In addition, they believe that a system like this will benefit projects that trade for hundreds of dollars per NFT, rather than millions, like CryptoPunks and Bored Ape Yacht Club, and will lower the barrier to entry.

“We’re hoping and hoping that this will be a boom for the entire NFT ecosystem and help a lot of those projects that are impacted by high gas fees—to make everything more available for everyone,” Duncan added.

Due to its former focus solely on selected NFT art drops, the Gemini-owned marketplace had invested in its custodial infrastructure for years, according to the Cock Fosters. Nifty’s business model has broadened—though curated drops remain—but the technology may be used to facilitate cheaper wallet-to-wallet trades for all kinds of Ethereum NFTs.

Duncan explained, “It’s uniquely enabled by the technology that we’ve already got, in these things that we’ve already constructed. The secret sauce that makes this feasible is the custodial mechanism that drives Nifty Gateway.”

In practice, this is how it will function. Sellers first undertake an on-chain transaction to grant Nifty Gateway temporary clearance to transfer an NFT, much as they would on other peer-to-peer marketplaces. The custodial system at Nifty Gateway then manages the process of linking the seller’s wallet to the buyer’s wallet, transferring both the NFT and the cryptocurrency payment.

For example, if an OpenSea peer-to-peer NFT transaction requires ten on-chain steps to complete, Nifty Gateway effectively takes all but three or four of those steps off-chain to save gas expenses. A transaction with fewer on-chain steps is lighter. However, they assert that the final effect is the same: the NFT is still sent from the seller’s wallet to the buyer’s wallet.

According to Duncan, only the things that have to happen on-chain happen on-chain.

They do concede, though, that not everyone will be happy with transactions that aren’t entirely on-chain, notably decentralization maximalists. However, the Cock Fosters believe that most NFT traders will choose to save money on gas expenses, and they intend to be open about how the system works so that customers can choose where and how to trade NFTs.

Once the feature is launched, the hybrid model will be the new standard way to trade NFTs at Nifty Gateway. In the future, the company plans to “explore developing a marketplace smart contract for optional, fully on-chain trades. However, there are already outstanding marketplace smart contracts out there,” a spokesman said, “so it’s not apparent that that’s where we can bring the greatest value to the ecosystem.”

Nifty Gateway has witnessed more trading volume since switching to the aggregator approach, according to Griffin Cock Foster, but its own handpicked drops can still hit large. Pak’s Merge drop, in which collectors buy “mass” tokens that eventually generate various NFTs, sold over $70 million in tokens in only a few hours last week, making it the platform’s highest-grossing single project to date. (Nifty Gateway has yet to provide final data for the Pak drop.)

Nonetheless, the co-founders hope that the new semi-custodial trading strategy would ultimately reshape Nifty Gateway’s position in the developing NFT market.

“This is a critical step toward changing people’s perceptions of what Nifty is,” Griffin added. “One of the benefits of working in such a young business is that there’s a lot of room to construct things that have a big influence on a lot of people. That’s what we’re hoping for with this functionality.”


Users’ email addresses are massively exposed due to an OpenSea data breach

The NFT marketplace stated that it has informed law enforcement of the occurrence and that an investigation is in progress.



The largest nonfungible tokens (NFT) marketplace in the world, OpenSea, has issued a warning to users after learning that a employee may have sent the list of OpenSea users’ email addresses to a third party while working on the platform for managing email newsletters and campaigns.

All users who have provided their email addresses to the marketplace, whether it be for the platform or its newsletter, have been impacted by the incident. OpenSea warned consumers about potential phishing attempts after the hack.

On Thursday, the NFT market reported that it had spoken to law enforcement about the incident and that a probe was ongoing.

The most recent data breach is far from the only significant attack this year on OpenSea and its subscribers. The popular NFT marketplace’s Discord server was compromised in May, which sparked a flood of phishing attacks. Numerous user wallets were in fact abused. The platform experienced one of its most severe attacks to date in January, during which a vulnerability allowed attackers to sell NFTs without authorization. The market covered losses of $1.8 million. rival Hubspot was breached in March, exposing users’ usernames, contact information, and email addresses on BlockFi, Swan Bitcoin, NYDIG, and Circle. Names, phone numbers, and email addresses of users of various platforms were disclosed to an unidentified entity.

Hackers may try to contact OpenSea clients by sending emails from domains that resemble or, according to a warning from OpenSea. Spam calls, texts, and emails have all increased, according to Twitter users.

Continue Reading


The Future of NFT Gaming Doesn’t Rely on Big Capital Expenditures

Large game publishers typically oppose your ability to trade freely. The economic model used in popular games, where players purchase in-game cash or points in order to unlock more content and improve their experience, is at existential risk from NFTs (non-fungible tokens).



If it were possible to regulate the flow of NFTs in a closed market, this would be a different story. Interoperability will be key in the future, according to industry upstarts, and digital assets represented by NFTs will be portable from one platform to another.

Large gaming companies generate billions of dollars from microtransactions, and a key factor in their success is their ability to retain players willing to pay money for in-game items. These businesses have developed systems that entirely exclude any legitimate third-party access to certain material or digital assets because they want their player base to invest a lot of money in the game.

NFTs have the potential to be revolutionary since they open the door for broad lending of these assets in addition to allowing speculators to profit. It’s no longer necessary for a player to put a significant number of money into the game in order to fully enjoy it by enabling investors to purchase an NFT and then loan it out to someone – either for a fee or a profit-split arrangement.

How play-to-earn is implemented

A fully developed gaming ecosystem will see the emergence of two different types of stakeholders. Investors who have a sizable portfolio of in-game NFTs are less likely to play the game in exchange for a daily return of $50. Then there are gamers from all over the world, who in certain circumstances would make significantly more money than the minimum wage under a profit-sharing system for lending.

The second category, who can have less money, is more worried about the short-term volatility and low liquidity of digital assets. They are unable to take the risk of accumulating NFTs in the hopes that they will be steadily profitable and hold or increase in value.

In the gaming industry, tradeable digital assets already exist. However, the practice of putting these assets on the blockchain is expanding; this was a general trend in 2021, when NFTs earned $8.4 billion in revenue. The logical next step for this sector is video games, and since more and more of these sales are shifting to blockchain gaming, there may soon be a noticeable increase in established companies moving in-game objects, characters, and skins on-chain.

As opposed to nominally belonging to the investor or player but really being at the mercy of a centralized gaming platform that can ban the user at any time, on-chain assets are designated as unique and belonging to one true owner. It’s more decentralized and provides users a lot more room to choose their own routes, especially when it comes to lending in-game items and lowering entrance barriers.

creating the framework for play-to-earn players to borrow If NFTs result in a rapid expansion of the player base in new markets, they can be extremely advantageous for game producers. Even before one considers how digital assets might be coded to meet cross-platform use cases or be employed in metaverses, making the industry more accessible irrevocably alters the entire landscape.

The compatibility of digital resources

The idea of full cross-metaverse employment of NFTs on a single digital identity raises a host of hitherto unimagined benefits. As a result, potential value is unlocked and speculation may be brought under control in a less erratic and more stable market.

The restrictions must be adjusted and will be based on the rarity of particular assets and what you may do with them. Can they be upgraded? Can you construct on NFT land to increase its value? Should players be able to own an entire mountain, or can they only purchase plots? It will be entirely community-driven if gamers own everything, but creators should have some voice and may feel the need to impose restrictions.

It is likely that a DAO (decentralized autonomous organization) operated system, in which the entire globe is owned by members and NFT holders, is now being developed. However, it is unclear whether this will be sustainable without a rigid set of regulations.

establishing NFT financing

When you attempt to transfer an actual NFT to another user’s digital wallet, problems happen. You would want the loanee to post collateral to secure the loan because there is a danger of the loanee defaulting. This creates a capital cost that acts as a barrier to entry for a sizable number of potential players.

A preferable approach would be one in which the NFT’s utility, or “wrapped,” is the sole thing rented out. An NFT holder can put the asset in a smart contract, specify the loan terms, post it for rent on the market, and let the free market function as it should.

The wrapped NFT is a newly created copy that has the same metadata, URLs, and other characteristics as the original and can be programmed to expire after a specific date. By doing so, the human-trust layer is removed, and the remarkable security that blockchains offer is provided. In essence, this wrapped NFT is only useful and cannot be spent.

It expires, returns to the smart contract at the maturity date, and is burnt as the result of a frictionless, risk-free, and collateral-free NFT lending system. Additionally, if the loanee improves a piece of land or gives a character a lot more playtime, the original NFT might appreciate as a result of the loan.

The blockchain will be updated with these changes as a direct result of the wrapped NFT’s experience. Most NFT projects and protocols are moving in the direction of this methodology in the wake of the infamous Axie Infinity hack, which cost $600 million.

The rumor about large developers

Popular game producers will find it more difficult to avoid presenting some sort of product if current trends continue and the NFT lending sector experiences significant expansion over the following few years.

Ubisoft and Epic Games are already testing, and it’s feasible that NFTs may follow the same trajectory as the idea of cryptocurrencies in general, where everyone will eventually use elements of distributed ledger technology. The notion is that this will become too alluring for businesses to ignore, or they may employ private chains or something similar.

The play-to-earn buzz is not something that traditional gamers like, and they frequently have a point. The overall quality of the market is now relatively low, and players just play these games to earn cryptocurrency, so there isn’t much to get excited about. This has a detrimental effect because it was once hailed as the new paradigm.

The problem of people quitting a project because the value of the rewards has declined due to a token price fall is still there.

Some time may pass before those seeking a better future in NFT gaming. The profitability of large developers’ existing strategies won’t be simply abandoned in favor of a more decentralized NFT-based economy because doing so would undermine their economic model. However, seasoned creators may begin experimenting with already-existing in-game assets as NFTs, and they may profit greatly in this fashion.

Unless their bottom line is in danger or a highly lucrative opportunity arises, multibillion-dollar corporations often adapt slowly. Maybe both of these elements will be crucial in bringing about a change in how we handle digital assets.

Continue Reading


How Axie Infinity Recovers From $600M Hack and Relaunches New Ronin Bridge?

The popular non-fungible token (NFT) game Axie Infinity’s developer, Sky Mavis, celebrated the Ronin Bridge’s re-launch.



Users may deposit, stake, withdraw money from the game, and access additional functions thanks to this cross-chain platform. In March 2022, the bridge’s remaining $600 million was drained.

Sku Mavis and the Axie Infinity team have been collaborating with law enforcement since the incident to retrieve the 173,600 ETH and $25.5 million in USDC. In this way, they have re-deployed the Ronin Bridge and compensated any users who lost money as a result of the attack.

All users have been fully compensated, as indicated in the release. Two outside firms, Verichains and Certik, have audited the new Ronin (RON) network. These businesses investigated the Ronin Bridge Smart Contracts and its components, then made their security findings public. Verichains reported

The audit team found certain weak points in the application during the audit process and made some recommendations as a result. The Sky Mavis team addressed and updated the smart contract code in accordance with our suggestions. There were no issues of Medium, High, or Critical severity with the Ronin Bridge Smart Contracts.

The updated architecture of the Ronin Bridge has added a new “circuit-breaker” feature in addition to the two independent audits of its smart contracts. This was specifically included to stop malicious actors from repeating the prior attack or making use of any potential new attack vector.

The corporation will reportedly make an effort to find the stolen monies, according to the notification. As previously announced, all users will be able to withdraw their funds in the interim:

As promised, all wETH and USDC that Ronin Network members own are now completely backed 1:1 by ETH and USDC on Ethereum. The entire user base has been restored.

This prevented the Axie Infinity DAO’s 56,000 ETH from being used. The condition of these assets will depend on how well law enforcement efforts go. The Axie DAO will “vote on next moves for the treasury” if this plan doesn’t produce any results after two years.

How Users Will Be Protected By Axie Infinity From Potential Attacks
The circuit-breaker system will function using a withdrawal restriction depending on total value. Large withdrawals will require the approval of over 70% of the node or, if they exceed $1 million, the signatures of 90% of the validators.

Withdrawals of more above $10 million require the approval of a manual review process that takes up to 7 days and requires the signatures of 90% of the validators. The daily maximum withdrawal amount on the new Ronin Network will be $50 million.

This limit must be manually reset by a Ronin administrator if network transactions exceed it. The project’s leadership stated:

We are more determined than ever to see Ronin establish itself as the de facto standard for consumer and gaming blockchain applications.

Continue Reading


Bitcoin (BTC) $ 19,083.34 4.97%
Ethereum (ETH) $ 1,024.98 9.43%
Tether (USDT) $ 0.999816 0.01%
Chiliz (CHZ) $ 0.094601 7.23%
Enjin Coin (ENJ) $ 0.472255 10.31%
Decentraland (MANA) $ 0.814827 7.96%
Flow (FLOW) $ 1.43 11.80%
The Sandbox (SAND) $ 0.975323 7.51%
WAX (WAXP) $ 0.087810 10.79%
ECOMI (OMI) $ 0.001319 6.48%