Connect with us

ART & COLLECTABLES

Due to a UI Glitch, OpenSea is Reimbursing Users Who Sold NFTs for Less Than Market Value

Due to a UI glitch, several OpenSea customers saw their NFTs sold for far less than market value this week. The NFT marketplace is currently compensating affected users and updating certain aspects of its user interface design.

Published

on

#nft #nfthours #opensea #reimbursement

Some OpenSea customers were horrified to discover that their valuable NFTs had been sold for pennies on the dollar earlier this week. And many people were understandably devastated.

“Guys, I just lost an ape…. I’m in tears…. How did this happen so quickly???? “On Monday, an OpenSea user known as TBALLER posted 15 sobbing emoticons.

Due to a UI glitch on the NFT marketplace, TBALLER’s Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFT was sold for about $1,800 on OpenSea – 99 percent below the floor price. The bidder who snatched the NFT instantly resold it for nearly $200,000, generating a $198,000 profit in less than an hour.

While the problem isn’t new, it has reappeared in a significant way this week. Elliptic, a blockchain analytics startup, discovered at least three attackers who bought over eight NFTs valued over $1 million for a fraction of their market value on Monday. Those NFTs were from the BAYC, Mutant Ape Yacht Club, Cool Cats, and CyberKongz collections, among others. According to blockchain security startup PeckShield, one attacker got 332 ether (worth over $800,000) by acquiring NFTs below market value owing to the flaw.

The company is “currently reaching out to and reimbursing affected users,” according to an OpenSea spokeswoman, who saw their NFTs sold below market value due to the “confusing UI” issue. Simultaneously, the marketplace is attempting to address the issue by raising awareness and providing consumers with more visibility and control over their NFTs.

What is the issue?

This is the source of the issue. Let’s say an OpenSea user receives an offer to sell their NFT for a particular amount of money. Instead of retracting the offer and paying the associated gas fees, they elected to transfer the NFT to another wallet. This indicates that the deal is no longer available on OpenSea. The issue arises if they return the NFT to the same wallet – the offer remains active and valid, and anyone might accept it.

When the NFT in question has increased in value between the time of the original offer and the time it is returned to the same wallet, this problem becomes considerably more serious. While the user now feels their NFT is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars (in BAYC’s instance), the NFT is sold for its initial price, which could be as low as a thousand dollars. And it’s this inconsistency that’s generating so much trouble.

On OpenSea, the only option to cancel a sale offer is to do an on-chain transaction, which is sometimes costly due to Ethereum’s high gas prices. This is why, rather than retracting their sell offer, OpenSea users prefer to relocate their NFTs to a new wallet.

According to Ledger CTO Charles Guillemet, “Gas price evasion is pushing terrible design and bad behavior from users.” “The scalability dilemma has never been more pressing, and the answers are Layer 2 [networks] rather than off-chain logic methods,” says the author.

Since its inception, OpenSea has had this UI design. However, attackers have only recently become aware of the issue. According to an OpenSea spokesman, the firm has kept this issue under wraps “because we didn’t want to risk bringing it to the attention of bad actors who could abuse it at scale until we had mitigations in place.”

“This isn’t an exploit or a flaw; it’s a problem that occurs due to the blockchain’s nature,” the representative explained. “Users must cancel their own listings; OpenSea cannot cancel listings on their behalf.”

How is OpenSea attempting to avoid this?

OpenSea has taken the UI issue “very seriously” and is working on many product enhancements, according to the company.

To begin with, the platform has introduced a new listings manager that allows users to quickly view and cancel their listings.

Second, according to the spokesman, OpenSea is reducing the default listing duration from six to one month, so that if an NFT is transferred back into a wallet after one month, the listing will have expired.

When users transfer an NFT out of their wallet that has an active listing linked with it, OpenSea will notify them and ask them if they want to cancel it. According to the spokesman, if OpenSea has the user’s email address associated with their OpenSea profile, it will send them an email in this respect.

This isn’t the first time that OpenSea users have encountered problems. A flaw in the NFT marketplace accidentally destroyed at least 42 NFTs valued at least $100,000 in September. Because the platform did not allow ERC-1155 tokens at the time, an OpenSea user named Tom Kuennen had his NFT vanish from his wallet early last year.

OpenSea is the industry leader in the NFT arena, with over 60% market share. However, due to a surge in activity on LooksRare, which has mostly been driven by wash trading, OpenSea’s market share has dropped dramatically this month. OpenSea has raised $300 million in a Series C fundraising round, valuing the company at $13.3 billion.

ART & COLLECTABLES

Ford is getting ready to enter the Metaverse with digital cars and NFTs

A month after the company announced significant personnel reductions, it has filed a trademark application covering its future initiatives in the Metaverse and NFT space.

Published

on

Ford Motor Company, an American automaker, has filed 19 trademark applications across its key automobile brands as it prepares to enter the realm of nonfungible tokens (NFTs) and the Metaverse.

Mike Kondoudis, a trademark attorney licensed by the United States Patent and Trade Office (USPTO), disclosed in a tweet on Wednesday that the business had submitted a total of 19 trademark applications covering its car brands, including Mustang, Bronco, Lincoln, Explorer, and F-150 Lightning, among others.

The trademark applications include a projected online marketplace for NFTs and virtual versions of its businesses’ automobiles, trucks, vans, SUVs, and clothes.

Ford intends to produce digital images of its vehicles, SUVs, trucks, and vans that will be verified by NFTs, according to USPTO filings submitted by the automaker on September 2.

The business also disclosed plans for “downloadable virtual commodities,” or “computer programs,” that would include apparel, accessories, and parts for vehicles for usage in “online virtual environments,” such as virtual and augmented reality trade exhibitions.

Additionally, there are plans to develop an online marketplace for “others’ digital artwork” as well as “online retail shop services featuring non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and digital collectibles.”

Less than a month after Ford Executive Chairman Bill Ford and CEO Jim Farley announced significant personnel reductions from its global workforce to decrease corporate expenses; Ford has decided to enter the Web3 area.

Ford isn’t the first automaker to enter the Metaverse market.

While premium automakers like Bentley and Lamborghini have already launched NFT collections, automakers including Nissan, Toyota, and Hyundai have indicated ambitions to enter the fast-expanding Metaverse market.

Continue Reading

ART & COLLECTABLES

Crypto-Vultures Profit from the Death of Queen Elizabeth

Only a few hours after the Queen’s passing, more than 40 meme tokens bearing her name have been released.

Published

on

Yesterday, according to Buckingham Palace, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II passed away. Although her loss triggered a global outpouring of sympathy and grief, it has also been exploited as a money-grab.

Elizabeth II, monarch
Grift endures eternally, but the Queen is gone.

There are over 40 meme coins on Ethereum and the Binance Smart Chain thanks to Queen Elizabeth’s passing (and at least one exploitative NFT collection).

While the news of the British monarch’s demise saddened people worldwide, cryptocurrency scammers took advantage of the occasion to launch dozens of meme coins with Queen themes on Ethereum and Binance’s BNB Chain.

Among the new crypto coins that were introduced are “Queen Elizabeth Inu,” “Queen Doge,” “God Save The Queen,” “London Bridge Is Down,” “Queen Grow,” “Rip Queen Elizabeth,” “Elizabeth II,” and “Queen Inu II.” Other tokens with the name of the next king, King Charles III, have also appeared. According to DexScreener, at least 40 separate meme coins appear to have been produced in the previous six hours.

The most liquid tokens, Save The Queen and Queen Elizabeth Inu, have already processed trade volumes of around $700,000 and $200,000 since their debut. At the time of writing, the price of Queen Elizabeth Inu is up 1,517%, while it has increased by 23,271% on Binance Smart Chain and 3,708% on Uniswap. Prices are incredibly unstable and exceedingly unlikely to persist.

The “Queen Elizabeth 69 Years NFT” NFT set has reportedly been produced. One image is said to represent each year of the Queen’s reign in the collection. The project’s aims should be questioned because Elizabeth II reigned for 70 years, not 69.

The crypto community, typically known for its gallows humor, mainly reacted negatively to the initiatives. When told about the NFT collection, NFT aficionado ThreadGuy said, “You’re going to hell.” Trader Byzantine General declared, “We’ve got to stop this crypto stuff.”

In 1926, Queen Elizabeth was born. She was the longest-reigning British monarch in history and passed away in Balmoral Castle at 96.

Continue Reading

ART & COLLECTABLES

One crypto sector, according to billionaire Chamath Palihapitiya, is experiencing a classic bubble cycle

One crypto sector may be going through a typical hype cycle, according to billionaire investor and software entrepreneur Chamath Palihapitiya.

Published

on

In a new episode of the All-In podcast, the CEO of Social Capital discusses the sharp decline in trading volume in the non-fungible token (NFT) market.

Palihapitiya offers Coachella and Burning Man as examples of major music festivals that strive to be distinctive but may wind up being mostly the same.

The billionaire contrasts NFTs and the overall art market with the two music events.

“I do believe that there is something going on; the simplest way to explain this is with the Burning Man/Coachella scenario. Many of these things are similar, but when some people approach anything new, they are too insecure to accept that it is similar to another item, so they spend a lot of time attempting to convince you that it is different. When someone says that a time is different, it’s probably not that different, as stated in the Warren Buffett quote, is an example. Or consider the other famous historical adage, “Things don’t always repeat in history, but they rhyme.”

All of this is meant to imply that, aside from major advances in science, not much new has been discovered recently. We keep repeating the same patterns, and one of them is the social capital that comes from making certain decisions and then having those decisions validated by others in order to feel valuable. And this occurred in NFTs, as well as, I’m sure, in the initial stages of several artistic movements. These events are more comparable than dissimilar because they have presumably occurred in a number of other markets as well.

Burning man and Coachella are same. The art market and NFTs are both the same. It doesn’t need to be unusual; you can simply appreciate it because you think it’s cool. I would just take it with a grain of salt and tell anyone who comes to you asking why it’s so different.

DappRadar reports that earlier last week, trading volume on popular NFT marketplace OpenSea reached a one-year low.

Continue Reading

Trending

bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 18,891.78 0.63%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 1,304.52 1.63%
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 0.999788 0.25%
chiliz
Chiliz (CHZ) $ 0.259432 4.45%
enjincoin
Enjin Coin (ENJ) $ 0.460494 2.29%
decentraland
Decentraland (MANA) $ 0.698674 1.90%
flow
Flow (FLOW) $ 1.64 2.39%
the-sandbox
The Sandbox (SAND) $ 0.863156 3.23%
wax
WAX (WAXP) $ 0.085734 2.26%
ecomi
ECOMI (OMI) $ 0.001253 0.74%