Connect with us


A Bored Ape Ethereum NFT was Recently Sold for $115

Is this an exploit or some type of tax loss harvesting scam, or did the seller accept 115 DAI instead of ETH by mistake?



#nft #nfthours #boredape #bayc

We’ve grown accustomed to seeing NFTs sell for large sums. Still, occasionally it’s the bargain basement transactions for in-demand NFTs—mainly those much below the average going rate—that genuinely catch our eye. And today’s example, the Bored Ape Yacht Club, is a great standout.

Today, Bored Ape #835 sold for just 115 DAI, which works out to just $115 because DAI is a dollar-pegged stable coin. The Ethereum NFT project, on the other hand, is one of the most popular and valuable collections on the market today, with the cheapest Bored Ape now listed for 106.8 ETH, or nearly $358,000.

Some speculated on social media that the vendor mistook the offer for 115 ETH (about $385,000 at the time) rather than 115 DAI. The NFT, on the other hand, was sold on OpenSea, which displays the USD value beside each cryptocurrency. So it’d be difficult to overlook it.

What makes this transaction even more suspect is the fact that the vendor (cchan.eth) also sold a Mutant Ape Yacht Club NFT (#11670) for 25 DAI ($25) at the same time. Again, this is far less than the floor price or the cheapest Mutant Ape currently available on a marketplace, which is 22.8 ETH (nearly $76,000).

While it’s possible that someone made a mistake and sold a pair of NFTs for $461,000 less than their market value, it’s also likely that it was the outcome of a scheme.

OpenSea recently dealt with an exploit involving inactive marketplace postings that had not expired automatically and compensated victims with millions of dollars. Additionally, when users noticed NFTs in their separate wallets being sold without their express permission, OpenSea blamed an external phishing assault. Both problems were eventually rectified.

As famous NFT collector Artchick indicated on Twitter, others have hypothesized that these Bored Ape and Mutant Ape NFT transactions are part of some tax-loss harvesting plan or tax evasion attempt.

When someone sells an NFT for a low enough price to assist offset other capital gains, this is known as tax-loss harvesting. However, suppose the person who sold the Ape NFTs also had access to the unlabeled buyer’s wallet. In that case, they might theoretically be using the transaction fees to try to hide a tax liability.

No one claims to have been on either side of these NFT sales, and it’s unclear who is behind either wallet right now.

Those who did buy the Apes, on the other hand, promptly redeemed the complimentary ApeCoin (APE) tokens given to Bored Ape and Mutant Ape owners. The buyer received 12,136 APE, which is currently valued at $181,000 as of this writing.


Ford is getting ready to enter the Metaverse with digital cars and NFTs

A month after the company announced significant personnel reductions, it has filed a trademark application covering its future initiatives in the Metaverse and NFT space.



Ford Motor Company, an American automaker, has filed 19 trademark applications across its key automobile brands as it prepares to enter the realm of nonfungible tokens (NFTs) and the Metaverse.

Mike Kondoudis, a trademark attorney licensed by the United States Patent and Trade Office (USPTO), disclosed in a tweet on Wednesday that the business had submitted a total of 19 trademark applications covering its car brands, including Mustang, Bronco, Lincoln, Explorer, and F-150 Lightning, among others.

The trademark applications include a projected online marketplace for NFTs and virtual versions of its businesses’ automobiles, trucks, vans, SUVs, and clothes.

Ford intends to produce digital images of its vehicles, SUVs, trucks, and vans that will be verified by NFTs, according to USPTO filings submitted by the automaker on September 2.

The business also disclosed plans for “downloadable virtual commodities,” or “computer programs,” that would include apparel, accessories, and parts for vehicles for usage in “online virtual environments,” such as virtual and augmented reality trade exhibitions.

Additionally, there are plans to develop an online marketplace for “others’ digital artwork” as well as “online retail shop services featuring non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and digital collectibles.”

Less than a month after Ford Executive Chairman Bill Ford and CEO Jim Farley announced significant personnel reductions from its global workforce to decrease corporate expenses; Ford has decided to enter the Web3 area.

Ford isn’t the first automaker to enter the Metaverse market.

While premium automakers like Bentley and Lamborghini have already launched NFT collections, automakers including Nissan, Toyota, and Hyundai have indicated ambitions to enter the fast-expanding Metaverse market.

Continue Reading


Crypto-Vultures Profit from the Death of Queen Elizabeth

Only a few hours after the Queen’s passing, more than 40 meme tokens bearing her name have been released.



Yesterday, according to Buckingham Palace, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II passed away. Although her loss triggered a global outpouring of sympathy and grief, it has also been exploited as a money-grab.

Elizabeth II, monarch
Grift endures eternally, but the Queen is gone.

There are over 40 meme coins on Ethereum and the Binance Smart Chain thanks to Queen Elizabeth’s passing (and at least one exploitative NFT collection).

While the news of the British monarch’s demise saddened people worldwide, cryptocurrency scammers took advantage of the occasion to launch dozens of meme coins with Queen themes on Ethereum and Binance’s BNB Chain.

Among the new crypto coins that were introduced are “Queen Elizabeth Inu,” “Queen Doge,” “God Save The Queen,” “London Bridge Is Down,” “Queen Grow,” “Rip Queen Elizabeth,” “Elizabeth II,” and “Queen Inu II.” Other tokens with the name of the next king, King Charles III, have also appeared. According to DexScreener, at least 40 separate meme coins appear to have been produced in the previous six hours.

The most liquid tokens, Save The Queen and Queen Elizabeth Inu, have already processed trade volumes of around $700,000 and $200,000 since their debut. At the time of writing, the price of Queen Elizabeth Inu is up 1,517%, while it has increased by 23,271% on Binance Smart Chain and 3,708% on Uniswap. Prices are incredibly unstable and exceedingly unlikely to persist.

The “Queen Elizabeth 69 Years NFT” NFT set has reportedly been produced. One image is said to represent each year of the Queen’s reign in the collection. The project’s aims should be questioned because Elizabeth II reigned for 70 years, not 69.

The crypto community, typically known for its gallows humor, mainly reacted negatively to the initiatives. When told about the NFT collection, NFT aficionado ThreadGuy said, “You’re going to hell.” Trader Byzantine General declared, “We’ve got to stop this crypto stuff.”

In 1926, Queen Elizabeth was born. She was the longest-reigning British monarch in history and passed away in Balmoral Castle at 96.

Continue Reading


One crypto sector, according to billionaire Chamath Palihapitiya, is experiencing a classic bubble cycle

One crypto sector may be going through a typical hype cycle, according to billionaire investor and software entrepreneur Chamath Palihapitiya.



In a new episode of the All-In podcast, the CEO of Social Capital discusses the sharp decline in trading volume in the non-fungible token (NFT) market.

Palihapitiya offers Coachella and Burning Man as examples of major music festivals that strive to be distinctive but may wind up being mostly the same.

The billionaire contrasts NFTs and the overall art market with the two music events.

“I do believe that there is something going on; the simplest way to explain this is with the Burning Man/Coachella scenario. Many of these things are similar, but when some people approach anything new, they are too insecure to accept that it is similar to another item, so they spend a lot of time attempting to convince you that it is different. When someone says that a time is different, it’s probably not that different, as stated in the Warren Buffett quote, is an example. Or consider the other famous historical adage, “Things don’t always repeat in history, but they rhyme.”

All of this is meant to imply that, aside from major advances in science, not much new has been discovered recently. We keep repeating the same patterns, and one of them is the social capital that comes from making certain decisions and then having those decisions validated by others in order to feel valuable. And this occurred in NFTs, as well as, I’m sure, in the initial stages of several artistic movements. These events are more comparable than dissimilar because they have presumably occurred in a number of other markets as well.

Burning man and Coachella are same. The art market and NFTs are both the same. It doesn’t need to be unusual; you can simply appreciate it because you think it’s cool. I would just take it with a grain of salt and tell anyone who comes to you asking why it’s so different.

DappRadar reports that earlier last week, trading volume on popular NFT marketplace OpenSea reached a one-year low.

Continue Reading


Bitcoin (BTC) $ 18,891.78 0.63%
Ethereum (ETH) $ 1,304.52 1.63%
Tether (USDT) $ 0.999788 0.25%
Chiliz (CHZ) $ 0.259432 4.45%
Enjin Coin (ENJ) $ 0.460494 2.29%
Decentraland (MANA) $ 0.698674 1.90%
Flow (FLOW) $ 1.64 2.39%
The Sandbox (SAND) $ 0.863156 3.23%
WAX (WAXP) $ 0.085734 2.26%
ECOMI (OMI) $ 0.001253 0.74%